" The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 11
wk of resistance training to failure vs. nonfailure, followed
by an identical 5-wk peaking period of maximal strength and
power training for both groups as well as to examine the underlying
physiological changes in basal circulating anabolic and catabolic
hormones. Forty-two physically active men were matched and then
randomly assigned to either a training to failure (RF;
n = 14),
nonfailure (NRF;
n = 15), or control groups (C;
n = 13). Muscular
and power testing and blood draws to determine basal hormonal
concentrations were conducted before the initiation of training
(T0), after 6 wk of training (T1), after 11 wk of training (T2),
and after 16 wk of training (T3). Both RF and NRF resulted in
similar gains in 1-repetition maximum bench press (23 and 23%)
and parallel squat (22 and 23%), muscle power output of the
arm (27 and 28%) and leg extensor muscles (26 and 29%), and
maximal number of repetitions performed during parallel squat
(66 and 69%). RF group experienced larger gains in the maximal
number of repetitions performed during the bench press. The
peaking phase (T2 to T3) after NRF resulted in larger gains
in muscle power output of the lower extremities, whereas after
RF it resulted in larger gains in the maximal number of repetitions
performed during the bench press. Strength training leading
to RF resulted in reductions in resting concentrations of IGF-1
and elevations in IGFBP-3, whereas NRF resulted in reduced resting
cortisol concentrations and an elevation in resting serum total
testosterone concentration. This investigation demonstrated
a potential beneficial stimulus of NRF for improving strength
and power, especially during the subsequent peaking training
period, whereas performing sets to failure resulted in greater
gains in local muscular endurance. Elevation in IGFBP-3 after
resistance training may have been compensatory to accommodate
the reduction in IGF-1 to preserve IGF availability."
I just stumbled upon this interesting study. It shows that
not training to failure is more beneficial than training to failure. Just the decrease in resting cortisol concentrations and the elevation of total serum testosterone is a good reason
not to go to failure in your training (or at least not too often). It's worth giving it a shot. For some of you this probably is the way it's always been. But for me things will change a bit. I always loved to train to failure.